DeadSpace: 7 Reasons Why MySpace is as Good as Dead

The first behemoth of social networking, MySpace—now owned by Fox Interactive Media—is on its way to its grave, with no one to blame but itself. MySpace’s popularity hit its apex in March 2008. In the following month, it was overtaken by its first real competitor, Facebook. But the writing was on the wall long before that. Web developers and architects all over knew that MySpace was doing it wrong. Surely at least a few of its own developers knew this and pushed for change. Still, MySpace was the slowest to adapt. For a site of that magnitude—including all of its systems, engineering and hacks to make it function—change does not come easy or cheap. The site was not built to do or handle what it attempts to do today, and its poor framework and conventions of interaction are a reflection of that. This is where the ever-important step of planning and laying a site’s foundation is so important. MySpace architects did not effectively build the system to be much more than a novelty. And while MySpace is not your average website, it serves as a lesson in utility for anyone charged with planning, building and running a website on any scale. If a better alternative in Facebook had never come along, MySpace would not be in this position nor would it have pushed to try to make any changes, even in the eleventh hour. People still want to connect to other people, share things they care about and display certain aspects of their life. Whether you agree with those aspects of our culture or not, they do exist, and MySpace fulfilled those motivations for a time. All you need is one competitor, however, one other option entering the marketplace, and the incumbent developers will be challenged to fight to the death. MySpace’s architects and developers simply could not live up to that challenge. In 2008, MySpace did begin to introduce features, tweak aspects of its foundation and attempt to crack down on the juggernauts of spam bots plaguing the site—but by then people didn’t care. Facebook came along, presented a better option, and people moved with little doubt that they would ever return to MySpace. Thus, in the same way it virally grew, MySpace will die by the same domino effect that catapulted its popularity. Let’s examine seven key elements of MySpace that rushed MySpace to its grave. (It should be noted that the following screenshots were purely at random and were very, very easy to find.)

1: Out-of-control design framework

Of the people you know, how many could lay plans for their own house, paint a beautiful portrait worthy of hanging in your living room or perform cosmetic surgery? Chances are, few. There are just certain things that some people have no business doing, either lawfully or for the sake of the rest of us. Designing websites is one of those things. Designers are in a unique class of professionals, and good web design is an exact art and science. MySpace disagrees, however, and allows their users to hack everything in the page until nothing is usable, legible or tolerable. Pages are riddled with high-res backgrounds, text isn’t protected, and colors, styles and sizes are fully unlocked—just to name a few. All of this creates a design playground which breeds annoying layouts that distract from the page's content. In contrast, Facebook has chosen to restrict at least the foundational framework of the site. While customization is an important aspect, it shouldn’t be allowed at the risk of the functional system—the very heart of a social networking site’s brand and reputation.

2: Auto-play music

People love music. It’s one of the few ubiquitous facets of life. In fact, Apple’s famed comeback as a technological and cultural superpower was all a carefully conceived plan to tap into our common love for music—and they rode that all the way to billion-dollar profits. In contrast, MySpace taps into music to annoy the living hell out of most of us. In fact, it should be noted that all non-prompted audio anywhere, on any page, is a widely unacceptable and an unwanted "feature."” This goes for ads, auto-play videos, and most important, unexpected, blaring music overlaid on what you might be listening to already.

3: Identities

The days of Internet handles are coming to a close. Yes, there was a time when one would be known as “Biker5445,” as systems continued to use usernames as main identifiers. Of course, Internet e-mail systems will still use some form of handles for some time. Most of today’s websites, however, no longer need to do this—particularly social networking sites. This is even more important due to recent news and events concerning privacy and security. The use of a handle is only good for concealing identity, and that doesn’t mix well in a site intended to connect people. What good can come from that policy in a social networking site? MySpace did eventually get clued into this basic, fundamental issue and started asking its users for their real name as an option: Again, too little too late.

4: Little focus on content with a horrible user interface

There’s actually too much of this subject matter to fit within this article’s short space. One could write volumes about the sheer usability and UI issues that plague MySpace. One thing is for sure, this aspect is a website killer, no matter if you are local deli or a major social networking site. In the case of MySpace, most interactions and conversations occur within a never-ending, scrolling guestbook. These “comments” also have very little restrictions and are filled with a cacophony of text, pictures, videos and animated gifs—all without any context in the conversation. Ultimately, the interface leaves everyone reading essentially one-half of an e-mail conversation between two people and no one else. That’s just the beginning. Features that are, at best, a one-time read about a person’s interests, life story, and favorite music, movies, books, television shows, heroes and foods are typically placed near the top of the page in one long column. Whether you have an interest in any of this stuff or not, you’re treated to it every time. The list goes on, but we just can’t stomach any more.

5: MySpace has cultivated a raunchy, immature base

MySpace’s culture—formed by the foundation created by its architects—has without a doubt developed an immaturity and a raunchiness that is unique to MySpace. It’s widely known that MySpace has sold-out to become a platform built around dating, which doesn’t help its state in terms of the quality of content. You can easily find all the "vital" statistics that you want from a date on most pages—everything from sexual orientation, build types, even income takes headline status. The archetypical “MySpace photo” is often mocked and mimicked today by a photo with the person in a sexually suggestive pose, with bright light and the camera aiming down from above. It’s not just about sexually suggestive material, but about the framework of how MySpace works. The site can’t be responsible for user’s content, or perhaps lack of content, but what MySpace’s architects have built promotes an underlying immaturity that is not present in Facebook—at least not yet. Coupled with all the other out-of-control elements, a light click-through of MySpace easily resembles a walk down a tattered, defaced red light district. And why is Facebook not facing this degree of the problem? Its architects have planned better. Perhaps it’s embracing the common sense of restricting anonymity. Perhaps it’s because Facebook doesn’t allow layouts and its interface to go nuts. Either way, it’s well-known that Facebook has attracted a more mature presence and left MySpace with the rest. If you have never experienced this cultural difference, click around random pages in MySpace—if you dare. Chances are, you don't need to and you're just nodding along with the rest of us.

6: Inordinate number of ads

News Corp is definitely profit-centric. Whatever soul MySpace ever had, it was sold to the highest bidder ages ago. The number of large, animated, irritating, irrelevant and sometimes offensive ads compared to what matters—content and utility—is terribly imbalanced. While Facebook has yet to turn a profit at the date of this article, it will eventually need to solve this problem and will most certainly shift its balance as well. Until the day comes when Facebook burns through its cash faster than investors can pour it in, this difference makes it an easy switch from MySpace to Facebook.

7: Spam

If there’s one thing that’s notorious on MySpace, it’s spam. The site’s spam comes in many forms, but the most prevalent are the spam bots for sex and dating sites. They pose as skanky figures, companies, scam artists, music groups and interest groups, which scour friend lists in public profiles and send out friend requests to drive traffic to their MySpace page or other shady website. MySpace came to its senses in recent times, figuring that this was annoying people beyond limits and started to ruthlessly crackdown. Again, too late. The brand of MySpace, “A Place for Friends,” became “MySpace—A Place For Sleazy Marketers.”

The Future

While MySpace's reputation is dead, Facebook isn’t perfect either. In fact, more and more people are becoming annoyed with its limitations and methods as well. It is still plagued with its own problems, some of them similar to MySpace in terms of its core usage. Simply put, there are things that “social networking” sites should be doing and they are not, along with things that they are doing and shouldn’t be. Facebook is—for the moment—simply a better option. But it’s got a thin line to walk as well, not the least of which is to actually turn a profit. With MySpace as good as buried, look to Facebook to begin making changes to address the pressures of creating more revenue. The balance between utility and profits will be tilted. The question is how much will it tilt and how much will be sacrificed when the next social networking site comes along and ups the ante?

More...

MySpace Helps News Corp Lose $363 Million [Mashable]

---

SEO the Right Way

Search engine optimization, or SEO, is a term you’ve undoubtedly been introduced to, likely by spammy email solicitations or SEO “gurus” who promise to “fix” your site so that it rockets straight to the top of search engine results.

But is this the right approach? After all, search engines don’t buy your products or services – people do. As a result, it’s much more important to optimize your website so that it provides the best possible experience for human users, not for Google.

In this article, we’ll examine why optimizing for real people – and better serving the needs of your website visitors – will ultimately yield greater success in capturing and converting new customers. We’ll start by letting you in on a little secret that those so-called SEO “specialists” don’t want you to know: by optimizing for humans, you will also be optimizing for search engines.

Why the “SEO-Only” approach fails

Before we dive into the principles and benefits of optimizing for humans, let’s first take a look at what I call the “SEO-only” approach and why it often falls short of expectations.

Consider this scenario:

You’re in the market to purchase a certain product or service, so you type some relevant keywords into your search engine of choice. You click on the top result, and as the website loads in your browser window, the next words out of your mouth are, “what the heck is this?”

The site is a confusing mess, and there is no clear indication of what the company does, what sets them apart or what you steps you should take next to progress through the site. Frustrated, you quickly click your browser’s “back” button and select a different result from the list, hoping to land on a site that will give you information that is easy to understand and seems trustworthy.

How many times has this happened to you? If you’re like me, it happens all the time.

In the example above, the website was “optimized” for search engines, and it ranked favorably for key search phrases. This is good, as it means that when users are searching for the products or services the company offers, their website has a good chance of appearing on the first page of the search results and being clicked on. However, the effect of bringing this visitor to the website was rendered null and void because the poor user experience it offered drove them away just as quickly as they landed.

In other words, from an SEO standpoint, the site is successful, as it ranks high for the right keywords and phrases. From a business standpoint, however, the site is an abject failure. It did not convert a customer. Even worse, it drove that customer away and directly to the site of a competitor. More often than not, this is what will happen if you optimize for only for search engines and not for actual people.

The complete package

The reason the SEO-only approach does not work is because it focuses only on a single piece of the picture – achieving a high ranking.

As we’ve just seen, however, capturing a lead because of strong ranking but then losing their business due to a poorly designed website ultimately yields no benefit to your bottom line.

To truly succeed, your website needs much more than just favorable search engine placement. The complete packages includes:

• Quality design
• Intuitive user experience
• Relevant, useful and timely content
• Support for a variety of devices
• Findability

Quality design and intuitive user experience

These two items often go hand-in-hand, especially when we are talking about optimizing websites for humans. The value of top-notch design is often underestimated and seen as little more than “making things looks nice,” but quality design is about so much more than that.

A quality design is certainly one that is aesthetically appealing, but it is also one that is easy to use. The simple truth is that your customers – and potential customers – do not come to your website to admire its visual design like a work of art hanging in a gallery. They come to your site to accomplish a task, whether that is to gather information, book an appointment, make a purchase, etc. They come with a specific purpose, and a quality design is one that does not distract them from that goal. Instead, it helps them fulfill it.

The scenario we described earlier of a user visiting a website that ranked high in search results only to immediately abandon the site due to a confusing user experience is a great example of why the quality of the design is critical to your site’s success. It helps ensure that the site visitors you attract are ones you can convert into actual business.

Additionally, a great user experience is one that happy visitors will share with others through word of mouth or, perhaps, via links on social networks or blogs. A quality design and user experience can help turn your satisfied customers into promoters of your website. And as we will see in a moment, inbound links to your website can be a very valuable asset.

Relevant, useful and timely content

While an elegant design and refined user experience are very important aspects of optimizing your site for humans, great content is what gives your visitors a reason to come back time after time. Providing value-add resources that are relevant, useful and timely – and that your site visitors actually want – is how you optimize your web content for humans.

You may be proud of the awards your company has won, the great things that have been written about you, your leadership team’s accomplishments or your company’s charitable outreach efforts, but that’s probably not the content your audience is looking for. Therefore, if you’re organizing your site around showcasing this type of content, you are only serving your own needs, not your visitors’.

Optimizing your web content for your visitors means putting yourself in their shoes. Ask yourself what they want to see, and then put that content front and center. All of that other stuff can still have a place on your site, but not at the expense of elevating the content your audience is actively looking for. That content must be given top priority.

You also need to make sure your content is useful and timely. If something is no longer relevant, remove it or relegate it to your archives and replace it with something that is new and interesting. Publishing a steady stream of fresh content is one of the best ways to encourage links back to your website from visitors who found that content useful.

What about inbound links?

One of the tried-and-true tactics of good search engine optimization is increasing your number of inbound links – that is, links from other sites that point to your own site.

Search engines treat these links as votes of approval for the quality and relevance of your site and factor the number of links you have established into their rankings calculation. Therefore, the more quality inbound links you have, the better your chances of climbing the rankings.

The practice of building inbound links is not an exercise in quantity over quality, however. Anyone claiming that they can get you “5,000 inbound links quickly!” is someone you should run away from – quickly! You don’t want these links, many of which come from link farms and other spammy websites. Search engines are smart enough to discern these type of no-quality links, which can actually send your ranking plummeting or, even worse, get your site blacklisted entirely.

What you want are high quality links from real people who have read your content and want to share it with others. Whether these links live on social media platforms, articles, blog posts or another site’s brochure pages, they are produced when a thinking human consumes your content and says, “Hey! That was really good. Other people will find this valuable, too. Let me link to this page.”

These links will both put your website in front of more people who are interested in the types of content you publish and help increase your search results rankings at the same time – a perfect example of how optimizing for humans simultaneously achieves the objective of optimizing for search engines.

Support for a variety of devices

Long gone are the days when the only way a user would view your website would be when sitting in front of a desktop computer with a large monitor.

Today, you can be assured that your website is being accessed via a staggering variety of devices with an array of different screen sizes. From handheld smartphones to tablets to laptop computers to the aforementioned desktops, your website must work well on a wide range of devices in order to be successful.

If you’ve ever searched for something on your phone, found a listing that looked promising and touched the link only to be presented with a website that was designed for a large screen only, you know what a painful experience that can be – that is, if you even bothered trying to use the site. Most visitors in this situation will just leave right away and look for another site that works well on their device. Again, the site in this scenario we’ve painted was optimized well for search, and it came up favorably. But yet again, the opportunity to convert was squandered due to the site’s poor user experience – in this case, the experience of using the site on a mobile device.

Once a visitor is gone, they are likely gone for good. Expecting them to come back to your site later when they are on a desktop computer where the site will perform better is wishful – and erroneous – thinking.

Optimizing for humans means making sure your website works well for them the first time they visit the site, regardless of the device they choose to do so with.

Findable websites

Yes, this is where the traditional SEO approach of creating high rankings for relevant search terms comes in.

When a searcher is looking for the products, services or information your site offers, you want that site to rank as high as possible in the search engine’s results to give it the best chance of being seen and clicked.

Achieving this high ranking is where most traditional SEO services end, however. As this article and the scenarios illustrated so far have shown, good rankings are just the start. What your site does with the traffic it captures through organic search is equally important – and this is where human optimization and all of the elements it encompasses (quality design, relevant content, device support, etc.) come into play.

Creating a “findable” website is about more than just attaining high search engine rankings, however. You want your website to be in front of someone whenever they are in need of your products or services.

This could mean a search engine result, but it could also mean a referral from a trusted friend or colleague. It could even mean a link on a social networking site or blog.

By optimizing for humans and presenting them with truly useful content within the framework of a design that is easy and enjoyable to use and that works well on any of the devices they may use to access the site, you’ll effectively encourage them to share your site with others.

This added exposure helps increase the findability of your website and your chances of having it land in front of real people who are actively looking for what you have to offer. This is the power of optimizing your website for humans.

Humans first, last and always

Optimizing your website for humans means making choices that will help them obtain the information they need from your website or perform the task they have set out to accomplish quickly, easily and without encountering any obstacles along the way.

It means putting the needs of real people first and foremost in all decisions that shape the design and content, with the understanding that by doing so, your site will be more appealing to those people, which can in turn make it more appealing to search engines, which will attract more people and links to the site, which will make it even more appealing to search engines, and so on and so forth...

It’s a cycle of success that starts with making sure that every element and every aspect of your site is carefully chosen and crafted to create an experience that is optimized for the human beings who will ultimately decide whether or not to purchase your products or services rather than just for the search engine algorithms that can only decide where your site ranks on a page.

---